Twenty years since the liberation of South Lebanon
I am writing the first draft of this essay on the 25th
of May 2020. Today marks the twentieth anniversary of the liberation of South
Lebanon from a fifteen year-long Israeli occupation. A lot has happened since
then, most notably a rewriting of Lebanese history about the role of the
liberators of South Lebanon: the Islamic group Hizballah. History has been so
thoroughly rewritten, and people have been so deeply brainwashed as to complete
the amnesia that took place since the end of the Lebanese civil war.
Sitting here in Canada, I can claim some distance and begin
to recant some facts long forgotten by the Lebanese. From 1975 until 1989,
Lebanese Christians and Muslims have killed one another mainly over religion.
It was during these years that the most horrible incidents occurred in the nation’s
existence. The most egregious examples were the Sabra and
Shatila Massacre, the Massacre of Damour, and the killing
of civilians on checkpoints based on the religion inscribed on their identity
cards.
The end of this war was engineered at Taif in Saudi Arabia
and sponsored by the George H.W. Bush administration. The agreement
called for many changes to the Lebanese constitution and laws, but most
relevant for this essay were:
-
the disarmament and
disbanding of all militias in Lebanon.
-
The temporary occupation of
the Syrians of Lebanon for no more than two years to build the state.
-
And the adherence to the
truce agreement with Israel in south Lebanon.
The only parts of the above clauses that were applied were
the disarmament of the “Christian” militias. Most of the Muslim factions
fighting in the civil war kept their arms. Most notably the Palestinians are
kept armed in refugee camps to this day. Worse still, a little know Shia Islamist
group known as Hizballah was allowed to keep their arms and even grow. They
were tasked with keeping the fight in the South to “Liberate” it.
Since the occupation of South Lebanon by Israel, it had
found allies in a local multi-religious group (although with a prominent
Christian Leadership) later to be known at the South Lebanese Army. These
fought along with Israelis and helped them maintain their occupation. Some also
had engaged in torture and massacre against the Muslim population. However,
massacres were not exclusive to one group in Lebanon. A truth and
reconciliation commission never occurred after the civil war, and the war
chiefs became the rulers of the country.
As time progressed in the 1990s, Lebanon was rebuilding. The
local Christian population was banking on the possibility of a Grand Bargain for
Lebanon. It would entail for both Israel and Syria to withdraw and all groups
to disarm. Instead, Syria remained, and in the south of Lebanon, war raged on
against Israel. Israeli politicians believed that to withdraw from Lebanon
under fire would mean to show weakness and to incite further acts of terrorism
or resistance against them from the Palestinians and other Arabs. Inside
Lebanon, the Syrians and Hizballah leadership claimed that Israel was after
Lebanon’s rivers and natural waters. Little did they know or admit that Israel
was a leader in water desalination and had several inventions in that domain. Furthermore,
Israel was assisted in its occupation by a local militia. In no other Arab
nation was this the case.
The root of the Lebanese Israeli alliance stemmed from the
civil war and from the alliance between some Christian factions who wanted a
Christian majority state and their Jewish neighbours who had their own state.
Towards the end of the first Clinton administration, Israel
fought a war against Lebanon in 1996 for about a month. It was named the Grapes of Wrath
which culminated in several civilian death, most notably when they attacked a
UN compound which sheltered civilian refugees from the south. It would be known
as the Qana Massacre
(not to be lost in symbolism, but Qana is said to be the site where Jesus
turned water into wine). Israel claimed that Hizballah was using civilians to
hide their military activities.
As the tensions subsided and as the Clinton administration
was working hard to broker a peace deal with the Palestinians, the Israeli
public no longer had an appetite for the Lebanese occupation, an occupation that
was costing them lives and money. In 2000, Ehud Barak, the then prime minister
of Israel, decided to withdraw from South Lebanon unilaterally. They even left
the SLA army to fend for themselves and later escape into Israel.
Hizballah immediately declared a great victory. They claimed
the success of the course of resistance. The legend of the defeat of the
Zionist enemy at the hands of the brave jihadists was born. No one thought that
Israel did not have an appetite to stay in a piece of land where it lacked
international legitimacy and had no settlements. Yes, over 50 years ago, Israel
had territorial ambitions on most of the Middle East, but that time had passed,
and Arabs never accepted it.
Indeed, Israel withdrew from the Sinai desert in the 1970s upon
the signing of a peace deal. And would withdraw from the Gaza strip in the
2000s. Yet where it does have territorial ambitions – the West Bank – it has
yet to make any serious concessions. And the 2020 Trump peace plan proves it.
Yet a Legend was born, and it is hard to end a Legend. They
would fight a war against Israel in 2006. A war that would devastate every
aspect of Lebanon yet would claim another victory. Today, as Lebanon is ravaged
by economic crisis the only real power in the country is Hizballah. They put in
place the politicians and regime in power. And yet no one questions their miraculous
victory. Why hasn’t Lebanon tried to implement the truce agreement with Israel
south of Lebanon in 1990? Why haven’t they attempted any kind of negotiations?
Even when the Syrians and Palestinians were doing so?
Israel left and made Hizballah the prime terrorist group in
the Middle East. Their power far exceeds that of other Islamist groups, and
they are well-armed and trained after the war they waged in Syria. They are the true political masters of
Lebanon, which is now officially a “Failed State.”
Comments
Post a Comment